My mind often gets baffled, and today’s example comes courtesy of the Arts and Cultural Council here in Rochester.
Next Wednesday, they are hosting an event called “Perspectives on Accessibility.”
Billed as a wine-and-cheese “evening of networking,” the event features a panel discussion “exploring multiple perspectives on accessibility and inclusion in the arts and culture community.”
Topics to be discussed include:
– Increasing accessibility through design and renovation projects;
– Efforts local arts and cultural organizations are making to create accessibility at events and performances;
– Marketing to diverse audiences; and
– An exploration of the challenges performers with disabilities face in local venues.
Panelists include:
– Lisa Helen Hoffman, owner of LHH Consulting specializing in audio described theatre for the blind, who has “a keen understanding of the satisfaction of broader access and independence for people who are blind or visually impaired”; and
– Chris Henning, Assistant Technical Director of Nazareth College Arts Center, who “is deeply familiar with all aspects of the renovation, including accessibility issues.”
Apparently that’s it, just those two people.
“Hello? Arts and Cultural Council? Hi, it’s the deaf calling. What about us?”
But I’m not surprised. Twenty years ago this spring, when we opened the Deaf Artists of America Gallery in downtown Rochester, it launched a heyday of accessibility for deaf people in the arts. But DAA expired in 1995, and these days the deaf community mixes with the arts & cultural community as well as oil mixes with water.
It’s obvious that if we don’t stay vigilant and make sure accessibility happens, it won’t happen. The hearing world will not do it on their own. And if we feel left out and start to complain, they will think we are shrill and strident and demanding, and an expensive group to serve, as well!
I just wish that all large arts events would provide interpreters as a matter of course, even if no deaf people end up attending. You may think it’s a waste of money, but you will be giving deaf people something you take for granted; the ability to get up and go do something at the last minute.
As it is now, we must ask for interpreters well in advance, and if something better comes along, we must say no, sorry, we’ve already made arrangements for an interpreter, we have no choice but to go.
In regard to next week’s event, it seems the idea of “accessibility” is limited to blind people and wheelchair users, those who can still carry on a conversation and balance their refreshments without the need to bring in outside parties (interpreters) at $50 an hour.
An announcement of this event at http://www.artsrochester.org/news/pr012808FebNetworkingEvent.htm gives no indication that an interpreter will be provided. There is nothing there that makes me feel welcome as a deaf person at this event.
How ironic … not only are we denied access to local arts and cultural events, we are denied access to this “accessibility” event!
I feel as if deaf people are forever destined to sit at the children’s table and beg for crumbs from the grownup’s (hearing) table. Access is granted grudgingly, and deaf people instinctively brace themselves any time they summon up the nerve to broach the subject. “Yes” is always a nice surprise.
I wrote to Christy Post at the Arts & Cultural Council to express my opinion on this matter and to ask for more information on the council’s Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee, which provided “considerable input and participation” in planning this event. I want to know how many deaf people are on the committee and what this group is doing for the deaf and hard-of-hearing population.
So far I haven’t heard back from her, but I’ll give it some time. I think they’re running around their office right now going, “The deaf! The deaf! We forgot about the deaf!”
5 Comments
February 14, 2008 at 3:34 pm
I just got a reply and here it is:
Dear Tom:
Thank you for your note and I do apologize for the oversight about ASL interpreting. We should have included a mention about the availability of interpreting services upon request and I will add it to the communications that go out going forward.
Accessibility issues for deaf and hearing impaired individuals will be addressed; they are just not mentioned specifically in the press release. While we don’t have a panelist with expertise specific to deaf issues, we will make every effort to address a broad and diverse range of accessibility issues at the event.
Thanks too for your questions about and interest in the Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee. The purpose of the committee is to stimulate awareness and dialogue on cultural diversity in Greater Rochester’s arts and cultural community. In support of this purpose, the Committee is involved in working with the Arts & Cultural Council to develop and present events designed to reach diverse audiences and address broad issues of diversity, access and inclusion. Next week’s event is one of a series of events exploring these important issues.
Please let me know if you have additional questions or if you would like any more information. I do hope that you will be able to attend the event as it sounds like you have a great deal of expertise and we would benefit from your participation.
Best,
Christy
February 14, 2008 at 3:35 pm
This is what I said in response:
Hi Christy ..
Thank you for getting back to me.
I just blogged on this topic: http://tomwillard.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/we-forgot-about-the-deaf/
With all due respect, I think an event that purports to discuss accessibility while leaving deaf people out is a bit of a sham.
An event on accessibility should be interpreted, period, with none of this “upon request” stuff, which sends the message, “We don’t really want you there, but if you insist, sigh, we will cough up the funds and make it happen.”
In all honesty, at this point, I am not interested in participating in your event because of the way it has been presented. It makes me feel unwelcome and an after-thought. I just don’t see how you could plan such an event and not include deaf people from the get-go.
You say you will be addressing deaf-related accessibility issues. How? Are you keeping your fingers crossed that some deaf people will show up with this specific knowledge? Or are you depending on third-party “experts” who have no firsthand knowledge of deaf issues?
I’m still wondering about the deaf representation on your “Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee.”
Well, thanks again for replying, and good luck next week with your “accessibility” event.
Tom
March 4, 2008 at 2:06 pm
It should be interpreted in probably a couple ways too: both ASL and real-time captioning of some kind. It would allow an opening for talking about broader categories of accessibility and making assumptions about your audience’s abilities. Although it doesn’t sound like they’ve learned that lesson themselves.
Also, I don’t find it credible that they couldn’t come up with a person in Rochester to talk about Deaf/HoH accessibility issues. That strikes me as a very convenient excuse. I’ve seen the same thing over the controversies about not enough women on graphic design panels: “We couldn’t find any.” Really? Not buying that at all.
March 19, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Forgive me for being delayed in reporting back; due to your blog I learned of this meeting and showed up; there were two interpreters there but one had been hired for the meeting.
Basically, it was reporting on making facilities accessible to the handicapped. Not too much interest for me; but it was good to get to know some of the people there and I realized that to make a difference, they need to be exposed to Deaf people on a regular basis.
It was fun chatting with the interpreters on common issues and interests. Looking forward to the next meeting and finding more people to share with!
April 1, 2008 at 7:23 am
Kudos to these who fought! I am sorry that I missed the happenings. Wish I could have know. Thank you.